Infrastructure inspection pilot

One asset. One inspection.
A clear maintenance decision.

Explore how drone capture and specialist sensing could support recurring inspections of waterfront facilities, warehouses and transport hubs.

Choose the operational question

Proposed starting point: one accessible quay section, inspected twice, to help an asset manager decide where a qualified inspector should follow up.

Illustrative workflow demo. The plan, observations and repeat-flight comparison below are synthetic. They are not findings from a port, warehouse or transport hub. No live flight, sensor feed or defect model is connected.

Proposed scope

Inspection plan

Schematic · not to scale

Select a numbered observation to review it.

Evidence needed
Next action
Sample visit comparison

Demo choices stay in this tab until reload. A disposition is a review step, not a confirmed defect or work order.

Maintenance handoff

Each candidate carries an asset ID, required evidence and a reviewer decision. Export the sample register to discuss the fields your existing asset system needs.

CSV export only. No connection to a maintenance system is configured.

Define the pilot before choosing the sensors

Capture requirements

Operational requirements

Acceptance evidence

Proposed responsibilities, subject to agreement: the asset owner sets the inspection decision and review standard; the drone operator plans and carries out capture; the sensing partner validates payload suitability; One Jump develops analysis and reporting.

Explore the existing flight evidence

Existing Newington wetland model in false colour

These are adjacent capabilities using existing datasets. They do not validate the synthetic observations above or establish accuracy on the proposed asset.

Open the interactive evidence →

Measure the value against today's process

Agree the baseline and pass criteria before capture. Measure inspection coverage, missed defects, false alarms, reviewer time and time to maintenance handoff. Validate any change against a qualified inspector's reference.

Inspection effort scenario

Illustrative assumptions, not measured results. Include capture, processing, review and reporting in both time estimates.

Released time is capacity, not guaranteed cash savings. Compare the full cost of aircraft, payloads, mobilisation, permissions, compute and maintenance before a commercial decision.

Agree one site and one measurable decision

Confirm an asset owner, access window, defect class, sensor and aircraft constraints, reference inspection, reporting fields and repeat-capture cadence. Set the pilot price and acceptance criteria together before starting.